What Makes a Brand “Sustainable” in the Eyes of Young Consumers?
Keywords:
Keywords: Brand Authenticity, Cultural Identification, Sustainability in Branding, Symbolic Interactionism, Youth Consumer BehaviorAbstract
The paper presents a conceptual framework for understanding how youths view sustainability in branding on cultural, symbolic, and trust-based grounds. This study shows that cultural identification, emotional engagement, and authenticity influence young customers’ perceptions of sustainable businesses, unlike traditional financial and marketing papers that rely on behavioral and rational considerations. The study draws on qualitative insights to interpret a series of theoretical propositions grounded in Consumer Culture Theory, Signaling Theory, Brand Authenticity, and Symbolic Interactionism. This framework indicates that sustainability perceptions are shaped by cultural norms and symbolic interpretations, while perceived credibility and authenticity foster trust and sustained consumer engagement. Theoretical and practical contributions expand the scope of existing knowledge of branding and consumer behavior and offer suggestions to institutions, marketers, and legislators seeking to design long-term strategies popular with young people.
References
E. J. Arnould and C. J. Thompson, “Consumer Culture Theory (CCT): Twenty years of research,”
Journal of Consumer Research, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 868–882, 2005.
M. Connelly, S. Certo, R. Ireland, and C. Reutzel, “Signaling Theory: A review and assessment,”
Journal of Management, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 39–67, 2011.
J. Napoli, S. Dickinson, M. Beverland, and F. Farrelly, “Measuring consumer-based brand
authenticity,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 1090–1098, 2014.
H. Blumer, Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall,
1969.
S. Beverland and F. Farrelly, “The quest for authenticity in consumption: Consumers’ purposive
choice of authentic cues to shape experienced outcomes,” Journal of Consumer Research, vol. 36,
no. 5, pp. 838–856, 2010.
S. McDonald, “Storytelling sustainability: Marketing strategies for Generation Z consumers,”
Journal of Marketing Management, vol. 40, no. 1–2, pp. 76–99, 2024.
K. White, D. Habib, and D. Hardisty, “How to SHIFT consumer behaviors to be more sustainable:
A literature review and guiding framework,” Journal of Marketing, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 22–49, 2019.
B. Nguyen, C. Simkin, and S. Canhoto, “The dark side of digital personalization: An agenda for
research and practice,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 116, pp. 209–221, 2020.
G. Hofstede, Culture’s Consequences: International differences in work-related values, 2nd ed.
Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1984.
C. Geertz, “The rotating credit association: A ‘middle rung’ in development,” Economic Development
and Cultural Change, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 241–263, 1962.
M. Granovetter, “Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness,” American
Journal of Sociology, vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 481–510, 1985.
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
IBR contents are under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. This permits anyone to copy, distribute, transmit and adapt the work non-commercially provided the original work and source is appropriately cited.
