BARRIERS TO GREEN STARTUPS IN
BANGLADESH
Ran Rayhan
1*
, Fatima Sadiya Khan
2
, Mir Mahaddi-UL-Islam
3
1
Department of Marketing, Independent University, Bangladesh
2
Department of Human Resource Management, Independent University, Bangladesh
3
Department of Accounting & Marketing, Independent University, Bangladesh
Abstract
This study examines the barriers that constrain green startups in Bangladesh and
explains why formal sustainability policies have not translated into accessible support
for early-stage entrepreneurs. Using an exploratory mixed-methods design, the study
combines a structured entrepreneur survey, interviews with green business founders, and
secondary evidence from policy documents and academic literature. The ndings indicate
that green startups face four interconnected barriers: limited access to appropriate
nancing, weak startup-oriented institutional support, moderate condence in intellectual
property protection, and low market acceptance due to price-sensitive consumer behavior.
This paper argues that the main problem is not a lack of policy but a policy-practice gap
that prevents small ventures from using available instruments. It recommends targeted
equipment nance, climate-focused incubation, stronger regulatory coordination, green
product certication, and consumer awareness programs to improve the sustainability-
oriented entrepreneurial ecosystem in Bangladesh.
Keywords: Green startups; sustainable entrepreneurship; Bangladesh; green nance;
circular economy
Introduction
Sustainable entrepreneurship has become increasingly important for developing
economies under pressure from economic growth, environmental degradation, and climate
vulnerability. Bangladesh represents a particularly relevant context because its development
progress has occurred alongside severe exposure to oods, cyclones, river erosion,
waste accumulation, energy constraints, and resource inefciency. Although Bangladesh
contributes only a small share of global greenhouse gas emissions, its population and
productive sectors remain highly vulnerable to climate-related shocks. This creates a
strong development rationale for enterprises that integrate environmental solutions into
commercially viable business models.
Green startups are important in this context because they can convert environmental
* Corresponding Author: Ran Rayhan, E-mail: 2320293@iub.edu.bd
7272
problems into innovative opportunities. Ventures operating in waste management,
sustainable packaging, energy efciency, recycling, renewable energy, circular fashion,
and resource recovery can support economic diversication while reducing ecological
pressure. Unlike conventional enterprises that may treat sustainability as a compliance
obligation, green startups often place environmental value at the center of their business
model. They therefore have the potential to contribute to climate resilience, responsible
consumption, employment creation, and local technological capability.
However, the emergence of green startups in Bangladesh remains uneven. Formal
policies and nancial instruments related to sustainable nance, waste management,
circular economy, and environmental regulation have increased over time. The Bangladesh
Bank Sustainable Finance Framework, green renance schemes, the National 3R Strategy,
the Solid Waste Management Rules 2021, and discussions on Extended Producer
Responsibility show that sustainability has entered the national policy agenda (Bangladesh
Bank - 2020; Ministry of Environment and Forests - 2010; World Bank - 2024). Yet the
existence of these policies does not necessarily mean that small green enterprises can use
them effectively. Early-stage entrepreneurs often lack collateral, administrative capacity,
technical documentation, regulatory knowledge, and access to investors who understand
green business risk.
This gap between policy availability and entrepreneurial accessibility forms the central
concern of the study. Much of the existing discussion on sustainability in Bangladesh focuses
on macro-level reform, export-oriented industries, green banking, and large manufacturing
sectors. Less attention is given to the lived experience of small and emerging green startups
that operate close to the market, face high uncertainty, and must educate consumers while
also developing products. Their challenges are not limited to nance; they also include
weak incubation support, fragmented supply chains, limited condence in intellectual
property, and cultural resistance to sustainable products that cost more than conventional
alternatives.
The objective of this paper is to examine the nancial, institutional, market, and cultural
barriers affecting green startups in Bangladesh. The study contributes to the sustainable
entrepreneurship literature by linking policy-level sustainability initiatives with micro-
level entrepreneurial experience. It also provides practical implications for policymakers,
incubators, nancial institutions, universities, and ecosystem actors seeking to improve the
growth conditions for green ventures.
Literature Review
Sustainable Entrepreneurship and Green Startups
Sustainable entrepreneurship refers to the creation and development of ventures
that pursue economic value while addressing environmental and social problems. In
contrast to traditional entrepreneurship, which often prioritizes market opportunity and
nancial return, sustainable entrepreneurship incorporates ecological responsibility
into opportunity recognition, resource mobilization, production, and value delivery.
Independent Business Review, Vol 15, No. 1 | June 2026
7373
Green startups are a specic form of sustainable enterprise whose products, services, or
operations directly reduce environmental harm. Their contribution is especially relevant
in developing economies, where environmental problems are closely connected to
infrastructure gaps, informal markets, and resource constraints.
In Bangladesh, green startups operate in a context shaped by both opportunity
and constraint. The country has a large consumer base, a growing youth population,
an expanding startup ecosystem, and increasing policy attention toward sustainability.
At the same time, the market remains price-sensitive, formal nancing for early-
stage innovation is limited, and environmental awareness often does not translate into
purchasing behavior. These conditions create a paradox. The need for green solutions
is strong, but the market and institutional systems needed to scale them remain
underdeveloped.
Green Finance and the Accessibility Problem
Finance is consistently identied as one of the most critical constraints for startups
and small enterprises. Green startups face an additional nancing challenge because their
projects may require costly equipment, specialized technology, testing, certication, or
longer payback periods. Even at the start, there tend to be higher start-up costs with the
purchase of capital equipment and raw materials. In Bangladesh, policy instruments such
as sustainable nance guidelines, renance schemes, and the Green Transformation Fund
indicate that green nance exists within the formal banking system (Bangladesh Bank,
2020). However, the availability of a nancial instrument does not automatically ensure its
accessibility for early-stage ventures.
Existing green nance mechanisms often t better with established rms that have
audited nancial statements, collateral, regulatory documentation, and the ability to prepare
technical reports such as energy audits or environmental assessments. Small green startups
may not have the organizational capacity to meet these requirements. As a result, a policy-
to-pipeline gap emerges: funds are available, but the entrepreneurs most in need of risk-
tolerant capital cannot easily access them. This gap is also evident in broader discussions
on climate nance, where nancing systems often favor bankable, larger projects over
small, innovative, and locally embedded solutions (World Economic Forum, 2025).
Regulatory, Institutional, and Intellectual Property Barriers
A supportive regulatory environment is essential to the growth of green entrepreneurship.
Regulations can create demand for sustainable products, dene environmental standards,
encourage recycling, and reward compliance-oriented enterprises. Bangladesh has
introduced important policies related to waste management and environmental responsibility.
The National 3R Strategy emphasized the reduce, reuse, and recycle principles. At the same
time, the Solid Waste Management Rules 2021 introduced more formal responsibilities
for waste handling and provided a policy basis for producer responsibility (Ministry of
Environment and Forests, 2010; World Bank, 2024).
Barriers to Green Startups in Bangladesh
Independent Business Review, Vol 15, No. 1 | June 2026 7474
Despite these developments, entrepreneurs may perceive the regulatory environment
as unsupportive when policies are difcult to understand, inconsistently enforced, or not
connected to startup-level services. Institutional fragmentation can also delay licensing,
certication, registration, and access to government programs. For green startups, the issue
is not simply the number of policies but the ease with which they can navigate them.
Intellectual property protection is another concern. Startups that develop new materials,
designs, recycling processes, or technology-enabled solutions need condence that their
innovations can be protected. Weak enforcement or lengthy registration procedures may
discourage investment in research and development.
Incubation, Mentoring, and Capability Gaps
Incubators and accelerators can reduce startup failure by providing mentoring,
training, networks, access to investors, and support for market validation. Green startups
require even more specialized support because they often need to manage regulatory
compliance, environmental impact measurement, sustainable supply chains, certication,
and stakeholder education. General entrepreneurship programs may help with business
plans or pitching, but they may not provide adequate guidance on circular business models,
climate nance, life-cycle thinking, or environmental reporting.
The Bangladeshi startup ecosystem has expanded, but green-specic incubation
remains limited. Social enterprise and general startup programs provide useful support,
yet climate-oriented ventures often need mentors who understand both business viability
and environmental performance. Without such support, early-stage founders may struggle
to translate environmental ideas into scalable products and services. Capability gaps also
affect access to nance because entrepreneurs who cannot produce credible documentation,
impact metrics, or technical feasibility reports are less likely to be considered bankable by
lenders or investors.
Circular Economy and Supply-Chain Constraints
Circular economy models attempt to keep materials in use through reuse, repair,
recycling, and resource recovery. In Bangladesh, circular entrepreneurship is visible in
waste management, textile recycling, composting, alternative materials, and packaging
innovation. However, circular startups depend on supporting infrastructure. Waste-based
ventures require reliable collection systems, sorting facilities, logistics, quality control,
consumer acceptance, and downstream buyers. Where these systems are weak, startups
must carry costs that are normally shared across a mature ecosystem.
The ready-made garment sector illustrates both opportunities and limitations. Textile
waste and by-products create potential for recycling and upcycling, but entrepreneurs
face inconsistent waste streams, fragmented collection channels, and limited access to
processing technology. Similarly, municipal waste ventures encounter weak household-level
segregation and low awareness of resource recovery. These barriers show that green startups
cannot scale solely through individual effort; they require ecosystem coordination among
municipalities, producers, consumers, nancial institutions, and technology providers.
7575
Consumer Demand and Cultural Acceptance
Consumer demand is a decisive factor in the survival of green startups. Research on
green products in Bangladesh suggests that consumers may express positive attitudes
toward environmental protection, but actual purchasing decisions are strongly affected
by price, perceived quality, availability, and trust (Uddin, 2021). This attitude-behavior
gap is common in developing markets where household budgets are constrained, and
environmental benets are less immediately visible than price differences.
Cultural acceptance also matters for ventures that convert waste into useful products.
Even when recycled or upcycled goods meet functional requirements, consumers may
associate waste-derived products with lower quality or social stigma. Therefore, green
startups must not only sell products but also change meanings, habits, and expectations.
Marketing strategies that connect green products with health, durability, national pride,
and long-term savings may be more effective than messages that rely only on abstract
environmental responsibility.
Research Gap and Objectives
Existing studies and policy discussions recognize the importance of sustainable
entrepreneurship in Bangladesh, but they often emphasize large industries, green banking
instruments, or national policy commitments. Less is known about how small and emerging
green startups experience these systems in practice. The gap is particularly important
because startups are expected to develop innovative environmental solutions, yet they
operate with fewer resources than established rms. A policy instrument that appears strong
at the national level may be ineffective for a startup if eligibility rules, documentation
requirements, or implementation channels exclude early-stage ventures.
The present study addresses this research gap by investigating green entrepreneurship
from the perspective of founders and ecosystem actors in Bangladesh. Specically, the
study aims to:
• Identify the major barriers faced by green startups in Bangladesh
• Examine entrepreneurs’ perceptions of nance, policy and regulation, mentoring,
intellectual property protection, and consumer demand;
• Link these micro-level experiences to broader institutional and market conditions;
and
• Develop actionable policy and ecosystem recommendations to enhance support
for sustainability-oriented early-stage ventures.
Figure 1 presents the conceptual framework that organizes the major barriers identied
in the study and the ecosystem responses required to address them.
Barriers to Green Startups in Bangladesh
Independent Business Review, Vol 15, No. 1 | June 2026 7676
Figure 1. Conceptual framework of barriers to green startup development in
Bangladesh.
Note. The framework synthesizes the main barrier clusters discussed in the literature
review and ndings sections.
Research Methodology
This study employs an exploratory mixed-methods design to examine the barriers
constraining green startups in Bangladesh. The approach is well-suited to an emerging
research area with limited prior empirical evidence, and the objective is to capture both
measurable patterns of barriers and in-depth founder experiences within the local context.
The research integrates three complementary sources of evidence: a structured survey,
semi-structured interviews, and secondary document analysis. The survey was designed to
generate descriptive indicators of entrepreneurs’ awareness, green practice adoption, and
perceived barriers. Semi-structured interviews provided explanatory depth and contextual
understanding behind these patterns. Secondary sources helped situate the primary data
within the broader policy, regulatory, and market environment.
Structured Survey
The survey targeted founders, co-founders, and key team members of green startups,
as well as selected ecosystem participants in Bangladesh. It included items on business age
and sector, familiarity with green business practices, adoption of sustainable operations,
perceptions of government support, access to nance, intellectual property protection,
mentoring and incubation support, cultural alignment, and collaboration with other green
organizations.
Due to the emerging nature of the green startup ecosystem, a purposive sampling
approach combined with snowball referrals was used. While a reasonable number of
responses were received, the usable response count remained relatively small and varied
7777
across questions because of incomplete submissions. Consequently, all percentages and
gures are interpreted as exploratory indicators rather than statistically generalizable
estimates.
Semi-Structured Interviews
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with green startup founders to gain deeper
insights. These included Md. Shahin Mia, Managing Director of Green Astha, the Chief
Executive Ofcer of a waste management startup, and the founders of additional green
ventures. The interviews explored key themes, including entrepreneurial motivation,
operational and technological challenges, funding experiences, public awareness and
consumer behavior, collaboration patterns, and engagement with policy institutions.
All interviews followed a exible interview guide, were recorded with consent, and
transcribed for analysis. The qualitative data from interviews were used to explain and
elaborate on the survey ndings, particularly regarding why specic barriers persist.
Secondary Data and Analysis
Secondary data were collected from ofcial policy documents (e.g., Bangladesh Bank
Sustainable Finance Policy, National 3R Strategy, Solid Waste Management Rules 2021),
reports by the World Bank, UNDP, and other development organizations, as well as relevant
academic literature.
The data were analyzed thematically. Survey responses were grouped into descriptive
categories, while interview transcripts and secondary documents were coded around
recurring themes including nance, regulation, and institutional support, intellectual
property, mentoring, market demand, and circular infrastructure. Triangulation across the
three data sources strengthened the validity of the ndings by cross-verifying entrepreneurs’
reported experiences against policy intentions and existing literature.
Findings
The ndings indicate that green startups in Bangladesh function within a developing
entrepreneurial ecosystem characterized by high awareness but limited structural maturity.
Entrepreneurs demonstrate reasonable familiarity with green business concepts and have
begun adopting selected sustainable practices. However, the overall depth of sustainability
integration remains modest, with most respondents reporting that only a portion of their
operations qualies as fully sustainable. This suggests that awareness alone is insufcient
for mature green entrepreneurship; startups require robust support in nance, mentoring,
policy access, market development, and infrastructure.
Survey data and interview insights reveal several interconnected barriers. Access to
appropriate nance emerged as the most signicant constraint. Although various green
nance schemes exist, early-stage green ventures face considerable difculties in accessing
them due to stringent collateral requirements, lack of technical documentation, and limited
track records. Interviewees repeatedly highlighted the need for patient capital and targeted
Barriers to Green Startups in Bangladesh
Independent Business Review, Vol 15, No. 1 | June 2026 7878
equipment nancing to scale operations.
Regulatory and institutional support was perceived as moderately weak, not primarily
due to the absence of policies but because of implementation gaps, bureaucratic complexities,
and limited startup-specic facilitation. Condence in intellectual property protection was
also only moderate, potentially discouraging deeper investment in innovation. Mentoring
and incubation support tailored to green businesses was found to be insufcient, with many
founders relying on general entrepreneurship programs that do not adequately address
circular business models, certication, or climate-related challenges.
On the market side, consumer demand remains constrained by price sensitivity, limited
awareness, and low willingness to pay premium prices for green products. Interview
participants noted that startups must simultaneously educate consumers while operating
their businesses, which increases costs and slows growth. Circular economy ventures
additionally face weak supporting infrastructure, including inconsistent waste collection,
sorting systems, and fragmented supply chains.
Overall, the results highlight a clear policy-practice gap. While Bangladesh has
introduced several progressive policies and nancial instruments for sustainability, these
measures have not yet translated into accessible, practical support for early-stage green
startups. The combination of nancial, institutional, market, and infrastructural barriers
continues to limit the emergence and scaling of green entrepreneurial ventures in the
country.
Figure 2 summarizes selected descriptive survey indicators related to ecosystem
constraints faced by green startups.
Figure 2. Selected ecosystem constraints reported by respondents (%).
Note. Percentages are descriptive and based on the exploratory survey used in this study.
7979
Table 1. Prole of Survey Respondents and Green Practices (N=42)
Survey Area Key Findings Details
Business Maturity
The majority are early-
stage ventures
<1 year: 31% 1–3 years: 40% 4–6
years: 21%
Awareness of Green
Practices
High familiarity with
green concepts
81% reported good to high familiarity
Adoption of Green Practices Selective adoption
Green packaging: 74% Energy
efciency: 52% Renewable energy:
26%
Depth of Sustainability
Integration
Limited depth
Less than 50% of operations are
sustainable: 69%
Perceived Ecosystem
Readiness
Mostly viewed as
underdeveloped
Described as “developing”: 76%
Note: Percentages are based on the exploratory survey and should be interpreted as
indicative patterns.
Figure 3 complements Table 1 by showing the uneven adoption of selected green
practices among respondents.
Figure 3. Adoption of selected green practices among respondents (%).
Note. Green packaging was the most widely reported practice, while renewable energy
use remained relatively limited.
Financial and Investment Barriers
Access to nance emerged as the most pressing barrier, cited by 83% of survey
respondents. Although Bangladesh has introduced several green nance initiatives —
Barriers to Green Startups in Bangladesh
Independent Business Review, Vol 15, No. 1 | June 2026 8080
notably the Bangladesh Bank’s renance schemes and the Green Transformation Fund (GTF)
— a signicant accessibility gap persists. Existing instruments are predominantly designed
for established rms possessing collateral, audited nancial statements, and comprehensive
technical documentation, requirements that most early-stage green startups struggle to fulll.
(Source: Bangladesh Bank Sustainable Finance Policy (2020) | World Bank 2024)
Small green ventures typically require patient capital for equipment acquisition,
machinery, product testing, certication, and initial working capital during the market
validation phase. Traditional loan-based products are often unsuitable due to high interest
rates, short repayment periods, and rigid eligibility criteria.
Md clearly illustrated this challenge. Shahin Mia, Managing Director of Green Astha,
highlighted the prohibitive cost of imported machinery and testing equipment. His experience
underscores a critical distinction: while general operating funds may support short-term
survival, technical upgrading capital is essential for achieving competitiveness and scaling.
Without targeted, startup-friendly mechanisms such as grants, subsidized leasing, or blended
nance, even highly motivated green entrepreneurs remain severely constrained. (Source:
UNCDF Green Finance Report | IEEFA Bangladesh Green Energy Finance 2025)
Regulatory and Institutional Gaps
Entrepreneurs expressed mixed to weak condence in government support, despite
the existence of progressive policies such as the National 3R Strategy and Solid Waste
Management Rules 2021. Only 38% of respondents expressed condence in the current
government’s facilitation measures for green startups. The core issue lies not in the absence
of policies but in implementation gaps, bureaucratic complexity, institutional fragmentation,
and the lack of startup-oriented delivery mechanisms. (Source: Ministry of Environment,
Forest and Climate Change (2010) | World Bank EPR Report 2024)
Many founders found licensing, environmental certication, and compliance procedures
excessively time-consuming and difcult to navigate without specialized guidance. Intellectual
property (IP) protection was perceived as only moderately effective. This moderate condence
is particularly concerning for green startups, as many develop novel materials, recycling
processes, or technology-enabled solutions. Weak perceived IP protection discourages
meaningful investment in research and development. (Source: Bangladesh Patent Act, 2023)
Mentoring and Collaboration Gaps
The survey revealed a signicant shortage of specialized mentoring and incubation
support tailored to green businesses. While general entrepreneurship programs exist, they
often fall short of addressing sector-specic needs, such as circular business model design,
environmental certication, ESG reporting, access to climate nance, and sustainable supply
chain development. This gap severely limits startups’ ability to become investment-ready or
policy-compliant.
Collaboration among green startups and broader ecosystem actors also remains limited.
A substantial proportion of respondents reported little to no interaction with other green
8181
organizations in the previous year. Such isolation is particularly detrimental in the green
sector, where success depends heavily on networks for waste collection, technology sharing,
regulatory learning, and joint market development.
Interviews, however, offered a nuanced perspective. While some founders preferred in-
house solutions for core operations, others actively engaged in policy dialogues. This indicates
that collaboration tends to be selective — pursued primarily when external partners offer
clear strategic value. Overall, the lack of dedicated green-focused incubators and mentorship
networks remains a critical capacity constraint for the ecosystem. (Source: UNDP Bangladesh
Green Startup Initiative 2025)
Market and Consumer Barriers
Consumer demand remains a major challenge. Respondents indicated that market
awareness of green startups is moderate and that societal values are not fully aligned with
green entrepreneurship. Price sensitivity is particularly important. Consumers may support
sustainability in principle but choose cheaper conventional products when the green
alternative is more expensive or less familiar.
The waste management startup interview provides a clear example. A founder stated that
public understanding of waste as a reusable resource remains limited (Green Astha, 2025).
This barrier affects not only product sales but also the supply side of circular business models
because waste segregation and collection depend on household and community behavior.
The nding shows that green startups must operate as both businesses and educators, which
increases their cost and slows market development.
Figure 4 presents two additional descriptive indicators that help explain the ecosystem’s
maturity: perceived ecosystem readiness and the extent to which social values align with
green entrepreneurship.
Figure 4. Perceived ecosystem readiness and social-value alignment (%).
Note. The responses suggest a developing ecosystem with only partial alignment between
societal values and green entrepreneurship.
Barriers to Green Startups in Bangladesh
Independent Business Review, Vol 15, No. 1 | June 2026 8282
Table 2. Major Barriers and Startup-Level Implications
Barrier Category Startup-Level Implication
Finance Existing green nance is difcult for early-stage startups to access;
equipment grants and blended nance are needed.
Policy and regulation Progressive policies exist, but startups need clearer procedures,
support with regulatory navigation, and targeted implementation.
Intellectual property Moderate condence in protection can discourage environmental
research and product innovation.
Mentoring and incubation General startup support is insufcient for ventures requiring ESG,
certication, circularity, and climate-nance expertise.
Consumer demand Price sensitivity and low awareness reduce willingness to purchase
sustainable products.
Circular infrastructure Weak collection, sorting, recycling, and logistics systems increase
operating costs for circular ventures.
Note. The synthesis combines survey responses, interviews, and secondary evidence.
Discussion
The ndings support the argument that Bangladesh’s green startup ecosystem faces
a policy-practice gap. National policies and nancial instruments demonstrate that
sustainability is formally recognized, but small startups do not experience these systems
as sufciently supportive. This gap is common in developing entrepreneurship ecosystems
where institutional reforms exist on paper, but implementation capacity remains uneven.
For green startups, the gap is particularly damaging because founders must manage both
commercial uncertainty and environmental complexity.
Figure 5 summarizes the policy-practice gap identied in this study and shows how
formal sustainability instruments are ltered through access bottlenecks before they reach
startup-level outcomes.
Figure 5. The policy-practice gap affecting green startups in Bangladesh.
Note. The gure synthesizes evidence from the literature, survey responses, and
interviews.
8383
The nancial ndings show that access design matters as much as fund availability. If
green nance remains tied to collateral, formal documentation, export orientation, or large-
project requirements, it will not reach many early-stage ventures. Green Astha’s experience
demonstrates that machinery and technical upgrades are central to competitiveness. A
startup that cannot purchase or access appropriate equipment may be unable to produce
at scale, meet quality expectations, or reduce costs. Therefore, the nancing need is not
limited to loans; it includes grants, leasing, guarantees, shared facilities, and blended
instruments that reduce early-stage risk.
The regulatory ndings also reveal an implementation problem. Policies such as waste
management rules and producer responsibility frameworks can create opportunities for
green startups, but only if entrepreneurs understand how to participate. A policy may create
a market for recycling or sustainable packaging, yet startups may still fail if certication,
licensing, enforcement, and procurement systems remain unclear. This suggests that
regulatory support should be delivered through startup-facing institutions rather than solely
through policy documents.
The mentoring gap is closely connected to both nance and regulation. Entrepreneurs
who receive specialized incubation are more likely to prepare business models, impact
claims, and documentation that investors and policymakers can evaluate. Without mentors
who understand green technology and environmental compliance, founders may rely
on informal learning. This slows growth and increases the risk of failure. Universities,
industry associations, development partners, and incubators can ll this gap by developing
programs focused on climate and circular-economy ventures.
Consumer behavior is another structural challenge. Green startups cannot rely solely
on environmental concerns; they must create value propositions that consumers understand
and trust. In Bangladesh, affordability remains central. Therefore, green products should
be positioned not only as environmentally responsible but also as healthy, durable, locally
innovative, and cost-effective over time. Public awareness campaigns can help, but market
development also requires product standards and certication so that consumers can
distinguish credible green products from vague sustainability claims.
Overall, the study suggests that a single intervention cannot strengthen green
entrepreneurship. Finance, regulation, mentoring, infrastructure, and consumer demand
are interdependent. A startup may receive funding but fail because consumers do not
accept the product; it may have demand but fail because waste inputs are unreliable; it may
develop innovation but hesitate to disclose it because intellectual property protection is
weak. Ecosystem coordination is therefore essential.
Policy and Managerial Implications
The rst implication is that Bangladesh needs green nance tailored to startups. A
dedicated Green Startup Equipment Fund could provide grants, subsidized leasing, or
matching nance for machinery, testing, renewable energy tools, recycling equipment,
and sustainable production technology. Such a fund should have simpler application
Barriers to Green Startups in Bangladesh
Independent Business Review, Vol 15, No. 1 | June 2026 8484
requirements than conventional renance schemes and should include technical support
for preparing proposals.
Second, policymakers should create a green startup facilitation desk or single-window
support mechanism. This unit could help entrepreneurs understand licensing, certication,
environmental compliance, intellectual property registration, and access to nance. Its role
should be practical rather than symbolic. The desk could also maintain a database of green
startups, connect them with investors, and track barriers reported by founders.
Third, incubation programs should become more climate-specic. Universities and
entrepreneurship centers can develop green business incubators that combine business
model training with environmental science, circular economy design, impact measurement,
and policy literacy. Students can be involved through internships, eld projects, and venture-
building programs. This would connect green business education with real entrepreneurial
problems.
Fourth, consumer demand should be developed through credible certication and
public communication. A national green product label could help consumers identify
veried sustainable products. Awareness campaigns should avoid abstract messaging alone
and should emphasize practical benets such as health, quality, durability, waste reduction,
and national innovation. The message “Made in Bangladesh, Made Green” could position
green products as both environmentally responsible and locally valuable.
Finally, circular economy startups need infrastructure partnerships. Municipal
authorities, producers, waste collectors, and startups should collaborate to improve
household segregation, sorting, collection, and recycling logistics. Producer responsibility
programs can create demand for startup services if implementation includes procurement
opportunities for small ventures.
Theoretical Contribution
This study contributes to sustainable entrepreneurship research in three ways. First, it
shifts attention from policy existence to policy usability. The ndings show that a country
may have green nance and environmental regulations, while startups still experience
limited support. Second, it highlights the interaction between supply-side and demand-
side barriers. Finance and policy constraints are important, but consumer acceptance and
cultural perceptions also shape startup survival. Third, it adds evidence from Bangladesh, a
climate-vulnerable developing economy where green entrepreneurship is relevant not only
for business development but also for resilience and environmental governance.
Limitations and Future Research
The study has limitations. The survey sample was small and exploratory, and response
counts varied across questions. Therefore, the percentages should not be interpreted as
representative of all green startups in Bangladesh. The interview evidence is also limited to
a few entrepreneurs, which provides depth but not broad sectoral coverage. In addition, the
study relies partly on secondary sources, and some policy conditions may change over time.
85Barriers to Green Startups in Bangladesh 85
Future research should use a larger sample across sectors such as renewable energy,
sustainable packaging, recycling, agriculture, fashion, and waste management. Comparative
studies across Dhaka, Chattogram, and rural regions would help explain geographic
differences in ecosystem readiness. Quantitative studies could examine how access to
funding, mentoring, consumer trust, and regulatory knowledge affect startup performance.
Further research could also compare Bangladesh with other South Asian countries to
identify transferable policy models for green entrepreneurship.
Conclusion
Green startups can play an important role in Bangladesh’s transition toward a
more resilient and sustainable economy. They offer practical solutions to waste, energy
inefciency, resource use, and environmental degradation while also creating entrepreneurial
opportunities. However, this study shows that the growth of green startups is constrained
by a combination of nancial, institutional, market, and cultural barriers. The central
challenge is not merely the absence of policy. Rather, the problem is that existing policy
and nance mechanisms often do not reach early-stage entrepreneurs in a usable form.
The evidence indicates that entrepreneurs are aware of green practices and are willing
to adopt sustainable operations. Still, they face difculty in accessing appropriate nance,
receiving specialized mentoring, protecting innovation, and building consumer demand.
The interviews show that founders require targeted support, particularly in machinery,
technology, public awareness, and circular-economy infrastructure. These ndings suggest
that green entrepreneurship policy must move beyond general sustainability commitments
and focus on the practical needs of small ventures.
A stronger green startup ecosystem in Bangladesh requires coordinated action.
Financial institutions should design instruments suitable for early-stage green ventures.
Government agencies should simplify access to regulatory and intellectual property
support. Universities and incubators should build climate-specic entrepreneurship
programs. Consumers should be engaged through education, certication, and credible
value propositions. If these interventions are aligned, green startups can contribute not
only to environmental improvement but also to innovation, employment, and long-term
economic resilience. Bangladesh’s experience may also offer lessons for other developing
economies attempting to connect entrepreneurship with sustainable development.
References
Bangladesh Bank. (2020). Sustainable Finance Policy for Banks and Financial Institutions. Dhaka:
Bangladesh Bank.
Government of Bangladesh. (2023). Bangladesh Patent Act, 2023. Dhaka: Government of the
People’s Republic of Bangladesh.
LightCastle Partners. (2024). Circular nancing in Bangladesh: Policy barriers. Retrieved from
https://lightcastlepartners.com
Ministry of Environment and Forests. (2010). National 3R strategy for waste management. Dhaka:
Independent Business Review, Vol 15, No. 1 | June 2026 8686
Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh.
Uddin, B. (2021). Consumers’ purchase behavior in Bangladesh: Green products perspectives.
Journal of Sustainable Tourism and Entrepreneurship, 1(4), 305-318. https://doi.org/10.35912/joste.
v1i4.475
United Nations Development Program. (2025). UNDP and FBCCI-IRC empower green startups to
drive the circular economy transition. Retrieved from https://www.undp.org/bangladesh
World Bank. (2024). Extended producer responsibility for advancing circular economies for plastics
in Bangladesh. Washington, DC: World Bank.
World Economic Forum. (2025). Why unlocking nance is essential for Bangladesh’s green energy
transition. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org
